The singer solution to world poverty analysis essay

The hardship endured by homeless and street children on a daily basis is unbelievable; a day without food to eat, a day without clean water to drink, a day without shelter, a day without cloth, a day without medical ca Singer is trying to convince his audience to donate their money to end world poverty.

the singer solution to world poverty logical fallacies

After it is suggested to proceed with intuitive based consideration, readers are then introduced to Bob. He incorporates rhetorical strategies vital to communicating the gravity of his argument.

Singer vs hardin

Any type of essay. In this world, wants are prohibited Should anyone be surprised if the man rolls up his window and ignore the poor boy. If Bugatti is his own investment, then his whole future depends upon it. Any subject. Bob chooses to save his car. Singer intertwines dollar amounts to break down how much it takes to specifically save a child. Museums and trips are definitely not on the list of necessities, and neither are CDs, books and computers that could store this information. Besides, despite the professed utilitarianism of the essay, Singer does not go very deep into the results of the actions he advocates. One can object that the high life standards of the Western society are promoted by the high motivation of the people and ingenious system that rewards performance. There are many things that can be done about this issue, however much of the world is torn between wanting to help and not knowing how to go about it.

Singer could have made his demands on fellow citizens more realistic and less frightening if he had chosen an example more suitable to his thesis — keeping necessities but letting luxuries go in order to provide necessities to others.

Bibliography Singer, Peter. Peter Singer is an Australian philosopher who has written extensively on poverty and social issues.

The singer solution to world poverty analysis essay

Peter Singer makes numerous assumptions within his proposal about world poverty, and they are founded on the principle that Americans spend too much money on items and services that they do not need. He is faced with the decision to choose to save the life of a child from a runaway train or to save his luxury car. Indeed, two philosophers, Thomas Pogge and Andrew Kuper, agree with this view that global institutions are more suited to prevent world poverty than NGOs. He is unknowingly sold to organ peddlers. The first thing that comes to mind is corruption that is so prevalent in developing nations. These range from the three appeals to strategically focused syntax. In order to give enough money to the poor, everyone who is working needs to only spend money on necessities. Sure, it would be great to end world hunger, but what about giving to those in need in the US? There are many things that can be done about this issue, however much of the world is torn between wanting to help and not knowing how to go about it. Or merely raise funds for charity organisations? By revealing himself in this light, Singer also adds credibility or an appeal to ethos. The lack of overseas help to this impoverished region was probably what triggered Peter Singer to write the article Famine, Affluence and Morality, wherein he claims that world hunger and famine can be prevented and possibly eradicated if everyone in the wealthy nations did their bit to help the sufferers monetarily. To evaluate if this is true, let us see first what the purpose of the essay is. There are many disagreements between experts in this domain, whether rich nations are morally obligated to help poor nations, whether helping the Poor by giving them fish instead of a fishing rods is a good solution? Human nature can be mean and unworthy, but so far financial reward has been an important stimulator.

It is a commonly accepted fact that those who work for their earnings are deserving of the monies that they receive. Singer introduces himself as a utilitarian philosopher.

The singer solution to world poverty soapstone

It is assumed that the reader has enough income to make a donation. On the other side of the spectrum, there were more than 1, billionaires in the world in Singer Singer uses Bob to conclude the essay as well. Singer attempts to guilt trip his readers by giving examples of life and death situations, in which lay in the hands of immoral people. Does Singer expect hard-working citizens to reduce themselves to a life consisting of bare necessities in order to feed immoral officials somewhere in Africa or Asia whose children are well off enough to pay their tuition at US universities? Although Singer does mean well and wants to make a difference for those whose lives are at risk, his solution to is too demanding for everyday people and his authoritative deliverance in not very persuasive. Singer would have a hard time trying to implement his solution in reality since it feels like elimination of luxuries has the potential to stop all the cultural progress in world and, even more importantly, deny people the right to enjoy something other than simple meals. By revealing himself in this light, Singer also adds credibility or an appeal to ethos.

From the early days, there has been survival of the fittest. These range from the three appeals to strategically focused syntax.

The singer solution to world poverty audio

Therefore, owning a luxurious item might actually be a necessity. Singer also fails to account for objections concerning the economic effects of his proposal. Imagining that the targets are middle-class Americans, Singer is hardly ready to force them into paying for charity with these examples and his relentless claim to give up all beyond necessities. He outlines what that means by defining what it is to be labeled as such. Singer could have made his demands on fellow citizens more realistic and less frightening if he had chosen an example more suitable to his thesis — keeping necessities but letting luxuries go in order to provide necessities to others. Besides, despite the professed utilitarianism of the essay, Singer does not go very deep into the results of the actions he advocates. But by doing so he would also wreck his prized and expensive Bugatti. There are approximately , births and , deaths happening in our world daily to keep the balance of nature, and 29, of those deaths are children Population Reference Bureau. This pushes one into thinking that effective efforts on combating poverty should direct funds towards projects like infrastructure improvement, sounder governance policies, and so on. Singer claims that we all have a responsibility to support people who are in extreme need and are suffering from absolute poverty. Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Singer supports his argument by indicating that we are somewhat like the characters in the story.

Rated 10/10 based on 27 review
Download
Analysis of “The Singer Solution To World Poverty” Essay Example